Do I Have A Medical Malpractice-Wrongful Death Case?

The scope of the medical malpractice problem.

Data vary considerably on the number of medical errors that happen in the United States. Some research studies put the number of medical errors in excess of one million every year while other studies position the number as low as a couple of hundred thousand. It is commonly accepted however that iatrogenic illness (disease or injury caused by a medical error or medical treatment) is the 3rd leading cause of death in the United States after cardiovascular disease and cancer. See, The JOURNAL of the AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (JAMA) Vol 284, No 4, July 26th 2000.

As an attorney who has restricted his practice to representation of victims injured by someone else's carelessness, medical or otherwise, I have actually gotten thousands of calls from potential customers over the last 20 years asking me if they have a medical malpractice case. Given that medical malpractice litigation is very costly and extremely drawn-out the lawyers in our firm are extremely cautious what medical malpractice cases in which we choose to get included. It is not at all uncommon for an attorney, or law firm to advance lawsuits expenses in excess of $100,000.00 simply to get a case to trial. These expenditures are the costs associated with pursuing the lawsuits that include professional witness costs, deposition costs, display preparation and court costs. What follows is an overview of the issues, concerns and factors to consider that the lawyers in our company consider when discussing with a client a prospective medical malpractice case.

Exactly What is Medical Malpractice? is medical treatment that breaches of the "Standard of Care" for medical physicians (or nurses, chiropractic physicians, dental practitioners, podiatric doctors etc.) which results in an injury or death. "Standard of Care" indicates medical treatment that a sensible, sensible medical service provider in the very same neighborhood should supply. A lot of cases include a disagreement over exactly what the appropriate requirement of care is. The standard of care is generally offered through the use of expert testimony from seeking advice from doctors that practice or teach medication in the exact same specialized as the defendant( s).

When did the malpractice take place (Statute of Limitations)?

Rand Spear Law Office
Two Penn Center Plaza, 1500 John F Kennedy Blvd #200, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA
+1 215-985-2424

In Ohio the medical malpractice statute of limitations is one year from the date of the malpractice, or the last date the defendant dealt with the plaintiff (victim) or the date the complainant discovered or fairly need to have found the malpractice. Some states have a 2 year statute of restrictions. In Ohio if the victim is a small the statute of restrictions will not even begin to run up until the small ends up being 18 years old. Be encouraged however acquired claims for parents may run several years earlier. If you believe you might have a case it is important you get in touch with an attorney soon. Regardless of the statute of constraints, physicians relocate, witnesses vanish and memories fade. The quicker counsel is engaged the sooner crucial proof can be protected and the better your opportunities are of prevailing.

Exactly what did the doctor do or fail to do?

Just to the fact that a client does not have an effective arise from a surgery, medical procedure or medical treatment does not in and of itself imply the doctor slipped up. Medical practice is by no indicates a warranty of good health or a total healing. The majority of the time when a patient experiences an unsuccessful result from medical treatment it is not due to the fact that the medical provider made a mistake. Most of the time when there is a bad medical outcome it is regardless of great, quality treatment not because of sub-standard medical care.

USA Today: VA knowingly hired physicians with malpractice, legal problems

The U.S. Veterans Affairs Department allegedly illegally hired several physicians whose medical licenses had been revoked in other states or who have had multiple malpractice claims made against them, according to USA Today. USA Today: VA knowingly hired physicians with malpractice, legal problems

When talking about a prospective case with a customer it is necessary that the customer have the ability to inform us why they believe there was medical carelessness. As all of us know people typically pass away from cancer, heart problem or organ failure even with excellent medical care. Nevertheless, we likewise know that people usually need to not pass away from knee surgical treatment, appendix removal, hernia repair or some other "minor" surgery. When something extremely unforeseen like that happens it certainly is worth exploring whether there was a medical error. If in doubt most medical malpractice legal representatives will discuss your case with you informally on the telephone. The majority of attorneys do not charge for a preliminary assessment in carelessness cases.

So what if there was a medical error (near cause)?

In any carelessness case not only is the burden of proof on the complainant to show the medical malpractice the complainant should likewise show that as a direct result of the medical negligence some injury or death resulted (damages). This is called "proximate cause." Because medical malpractice lawsuits is so expensive to pursue the injuries should be considerable to call for moving on with the case. All medical errors are "malpractice" however only a little percentage of errors give rise to medical malpractice cases.

By way of example, if a moms and dad takes his boy to the emergency clinic after a skateboard mishap and the ER doctor doesn't do x-rays in spite of an obvious bend in the child's lower arm and tells the daddy his kid has "just a sprain" this most likely is medical malpractice. However, if the child is correctly detected within a couple of days and makes a total healing it is unlikely the "damages" are severe sufficient to undertake a suit that likely would cost in excess of $50,000.00. However, if because of the delay in being appropriately detected, the kid has to have his arm re-broken and the growth plate is irreparably harmed due to the delay then the damages likely would require further investigation and a possible suit.

Other essential factors to consider.

Other concerns that are very important when determining whether a customer has a malpractice case consist of the victim's behavior and medical history. Did the victim do anything to cause or add to the bad medical outcome? A common strategy of medical malpractice defense attorneys is to blame the patient. If it is a birth injury case, did the mom have appropriate prenatal care, did she smoke or utilize drugs during her pregnancy? In other cases, did the client follow the doctor's orders, keep his visits, take his medication as advised and tell the physician the truth? These are realities that we have to know in order to determine whether the medical professional will have a legitimate defense to the malpractice claim?

What takes place if it appears like there is a case?

If appears that the client might have been a victim of a medical error, the medical mistake triggered a considerable injury or death and the client was certified with his doctor's orders, then we have to get the patient's medical records. For the most parts, acquiring the medical records involves absolutely nothing more mailing a release signed by the client to the medical professional and/or healthcare facility along with a letter asking for the records. When it comes to wrongful death, an administrator of the victims estate needs to be appointed in the local county court of probate then the executor can sign the release requesting the records.

When the records are received we evaluate them to make sure they are total. It is not unusual in medical negligence cases to receive insufficient medical charts. When all the relevant records are obtained they are offered to a competent medical specialist for review and viewpoint. If the case protests an emergency clinic doctor we have an emergency clinic doctor evaluate the case, if it protests a cardiologist we need to obtain a viewpoint from a cardiologist, etc

. Mostly, exactly what we want to know form the professional is 1) was the treatment supplied below the requirement of care, 2) did the infraction of the standard of care lead to the patients injury or death? If the medical professionals viewpoint agrees with on both counts a suit will be prepared on the client's behalf and usually submitted in the court of typical pleas in the county where the malpractice was dedicated or in the county where the offender lives. In some limited scenarios jurisdiction for the malpractice lawsuit could be federal court or some other court.


In sum, an excellent malpractice legal representative will carefully and thoroughly evaluate any possible malpractice case prior to submitting a lawsuit. It's not fair to the victim or the physicians to file a suit unless the specialist informs us that he thinks there is a strong basis to bring the suit. Due to the expense of pursuing a medical neglect action no good lawyer has the time or resources to lose on a "frivolous lawsuit."

When talking to a malpractice legal representative it is essential to properly give the attorney as much information as possible and respond to the lawyer's concerns as entirely as possible. Prior to speaking to a legal representative think about making some notes so you do not forget some essential reality or situation the lawyer may need.

Lastly, if you think you might have a malpractice case get in touch with an excellent malpractice lawyer as soon as possible so there are no statute of constraints issues in your case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *